ET

EpsTracked

Back to Events

Thomas M. Lynch IVJane Doe #3

RealizedLayer 2IMAGES-003-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015614_txt_23592_EVT_002
25%

Event Description

Judge Lynch granted the motion as to Jane Doe #3's subpoena requests #9, 17, 18, 20, and 23, but denied the motion as to other requests while ordering a confidentiality order to be entered.

Quoted Evidence

As to the 'Jane Doe #3' subpoena: The motion is granted as to request #9, 17, 18, 20 and 23. The motion is denied as to the other requests, but a confidentiality order shall be entered.

Trafficking Assessment

Likelihood

25%

Confidence

85%

Thread Prior

15%

Indicators

Jane Doe #3 referenced anonymouslyselective quashing of subpoena requestsconfidentiality order imposed

Reasoning

Jane Doe #3's anonymity and the partial quashing of subpoena requests (#9, 17, 18, 20, 23) could theoretically relate to concealment of victim testimony. However, in civil litigation context, confidentiality orders and sealed subpoena requests are standard protective measures for any witness, not trafficking-specific. No procurement, coercion, or exploitation language is present. The baseline likelihood reflects ordinary litigation privacy safeguards rather than trafficking activity.